Dear students,
Here is a cartoon of the Krebs cycle. Making and coloring it helped me learn the biochemistry!!
Compound names are abbreviated, which is fine, because you have memorized them already. (See previous post.)
The pie wedges making up the cycle are not equivalent in radius - that's because I drew them to show number of carbon atoms in each compound. At the top, for example, acetyl coA donates a two-carbon fragment (the acetyl group) to four-carbon oxaloacetate, yielding six-carbon citrate. Two steps later, a CO2 molecule is split off, yielding a five-carbon molecule (alpha-ketoglutarate)...
The blue teardrop signs show where a water molecule enters a reaction (to be incorporated into organic molecules).
If you would like to color this yourself, here is a coloring page. You can save the image and print out a few copies. (Please don't sell it without my permission.)
Students, when we meet next, let's have a quiz on the Krebs cycle!
cheers,
Morgan G.
Friday, October 28, 2011
Thursday, October 27, 2011
Learning the Krebs Cycle: Step One
How in the world are you supposed to memorize the steps of the Krebs Cycle?
There are just eight steps, butmany nearly all of these are reactions with two or more reactants and two or more products. It adds up fast.
For the exam, you are responsible for knowing six of the eight steps. Maybe you might as well just learn the whole thing.
I don't recall how I memorized the Krebs cycle, back in college.
As I try to learn it again, I am coming up with some tricks to break up the information into bite-size chunks, and spice them with tasty significance.
There are really two tasks here. We can do them one at a time.
The first task is to learn the names of the reactants, and where they go in the pathway.
The second task is to learn which of these reactions HARVEST ENERGY
(by reduction of NAD+ to NADH, or reduction of FAD to FADH2, or production of ATP) ...
…and/or RELEASE WASTE
(by splitting off a molecule of carbon dioxide).
The first task is relatively straightforward. Stare at the Krebs cycle diagram and utter the names of the metabolites, in order of appearance. Start with Citrate.
Citrate, Isocitrate, Alpha-Ketoglutarate, Succinyl-CoA, Succinate, Fumarate, Malate, Oxaloacetate.
Do it again, until these words are familiar to you.
Now make up a mnemonic to remind you of the order. I like to make up a sentence consisting of words that begin with the first letter (or better, the first two or three letters) of the corresponding word series.
Cities, isolated, actually suck successfully, fuming malodorous oxaloacetate.
You may be able to do better. (A dictionary helps.) Once you have a mnemonic you like, recite it till memorized. Then you can practice reciting the real thing.
I'll add a note on pronunciation. (You learn better if you can read out loud.)
Citrate, Iso-citrate, Alpha-Keto-glutarate, Succinyl-CoA, Succinate, Fumarate, Malate, Oxalo-acetate.
Later (posting this evening, I hope) I'll show you how I've tackled the second task. I've figured out a couple tricks for graphically conceptualizing the reaction cycle and remembering how and where you get energy harvest and waste production.
cheers,
Morgan G.
There are just eight steps, but
For the exam, you are responsible for knowing six of the eight steps. Maybe you might as well just learn the whole thing.
I don't recall how I memorized the Krebs cycle, back in college.
As I try to learn it again, I am coming up with some tricks to break up the information into bite-size chunks, and spice them with tasty significance.
There are really two tasks here. We can do them one at a time.
The first task is to learn the names of the reactants, and where they go in the pathway.
The second task is to learn which of these reactions HARVEST ENERGY
(by reduction of NAD+ to NADH, or reduction of FAD to FADH2, or production of ATP) ...
…and/or RELEASE WASTE
(by splitting off a molecule of carbon dioxide).
The first task is relatively straightforward. Stare at the Krebs cycle diagram and utter the names of the metabolites, in order of appearance. Start with Citrate.
Citrate, Isocitrate, Alpha-Ketoglutarate, Succinyl-CoA, Succinate, Fumarate, Malate, Oxaloacetate.
Do it again, until these words are familiar to you.
Now make up a mnemonic to remind you of the order. I like to make up a sentence consisting of words that begin with the first letter (or better, the first two or three letters) of the corresponding word series.
Cities, isolated, actually suck successfully, fuming malodorous oxaloacetate.
You may be able to do better. (A dictionary helps.) Once you have a mnemonic you like, recite it till memorized. Then you can practice reciting the real thing.
I'll add a note on pronunciation. (You learn better if you can read out loud.)
Citrate, Iso-citrate, Alpha-Keto-glutarate, Succinyl-CoA, Succinate, Fumarate, Malate, Oxalo-acetate.
Later (posting this evening, I hope) I'll show you how I've tackled the second task. I've figured out a couple tricks for graphically conceptualizing the reaction cycle and remembering how and where you get energy harvest and waste production.
cheers,
Morgan G.
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
Fermentation: why?
Your teacher has advised you to open your textbook on the day before the lab and read pages 170-173. If you did this, you found a story about how cells can get energy from sugar when there is no oxygen around. It's called fermentation, and it is nicely summarized in Figure 9.17 of the textbook.
Recall that you can harvest a little bit of energy out of glycolysis: even before you send your pyruvate to be oxidized into carbon dioxide in the Krebs cycle, you've made a net profit of 2 ATP per glucose. Not much, but if there's no oxygen to accept electrons from NADH and FADH2, then the Krebs cycle stops, and glycolysis is the best you can do.
The real problem is that step 6 of glycolysis consumes NAD+. If you keep on doing glycolysis, you will quickly run out of NAD+ (it all gets reduced to NADH, which is useless without oxygen) and glycolysis will stop. How to turn that built-up NADH back into NAD+? Fermentation.
What you need is an oxidizing agent to take electrons away from NADH. Happily, the pyruvate that you get out of glycolysis can do this job. In the cells of animals such as ourselves, this happens directly: with the help of an enzyme, pyruvate oxidizes NADH to NAD+, and is converted (reduced) to lactate - which gets shipped out of the cell and detoxified by your liver.
Other critters, like yeast, take a short detour and first convert pyruvate to 2-acetaldehyde. This is used as an oxidizing agent to regenerate NAD+. In this reaction, 2-acetaldehyde is reduced to ethanol.
Regardless of how it's done, it's an elegant way to keep glycolysis going in the absence of oxygen. In one fell swoop, you do two essential jobs: regenerate NAD+ and funnel away pyruvate. Both of these jobs are important. Why? Because if the product of any reaction builds up to a high concentration, the reaction will slow down - and can even run backwards.
(Why is this so?)
The products of fermentation can be experienced directly: when you sprint up a long hill, your legs hurt as a result of lactic acid flooding out of the muscle cells. When you consume fruit that has been heavily colonized by yeast, ethanol enters your brain and your thinking becomes sloppy. If this happens, do not drive or operate machinery.
Here is another question: is all this writing helpful? If not, I won't do it.
Recall that you can harvest a little bit of energy out of glycolysis: even before you send your pyruvate to be oxidized into carbon dioxide in the Krebs cycle, you've made a net profit of 2 ATP per glucose. Not much, but if there's no oxygen to accept electrons from NADH and FADH2, then the Krebs cycle stops, and glycolysis is the best you can do.
The real problem is that step 6 of glycolysis consumes NAD+. If you keep on doing glycolysis, you will quickly run out of NAD+ (it all gets reduced to NADH, which is useless without oxygen) and glycolysis will stop. How to turn that built-up NADH back into NAD+? Fermentation.
What you need is an oxidizing agent to take electrons away from NADH. Happily, the pyruvate that you get out of glycolysis can do this job. In the cells of animals such as ourselves, this happens directly: with the help of an enzyme, pyruvate oxidizes NADH to NAD+, and is converted (reduced) to lactate - which gets shipped out of the cell and detoxified by your liver.
Other critters, like yeast, take a short detour and first convert pyruvate to 2-acetaldehyde. This is used as an oxidizing agent to regenerate NAD+. In this reaction, 2-acetaldehyde is reduced to ethanol.
Regardless of how it's done, it's an elegant way to keep glycolysis going in the absence of oxygen. In one fell swoop, you do two essential jobs: regenerate NAD+ and funnel away pyruvate. Both of these jobs are important. Why? Because if the product of any reaction builds up to a high concentration, the reaction will slow down - and can even run backwards.
(Why is this so?)
The products of fermentation can be experienced directly: when you sprint up a long hill, your legs hurt as a result of lactic acid flooding out of the muscle cells. When you consume fruit that has been heavily colonized by yeast, ethanol enters your brain and your thinking becomes sloppy. If this happens, do not drive or operate machinery.
Here is another question: is all this writing helpful? If not, I won't do it.
Sunday, October 23, 2011
Notetaking as creative process
More about taking notes:
It's about making the material your own.
When you write stuff down, you are creating a new model; though it's meant to mirror the piece of reality you're trying to grasp, it remains an original creation. It's a story written by you, for you. Tell the best story you can, in a language designed for you to understand.
Here's an example of how I take notes for myself. (Click to enlarge.)
I distill major points from the text. I draw lots of diagrams and cartoons. I copy (and often modify) figures from the text. Hand-copying things is a good way to remember them! Adding your own flavor and insight to this fresh copy makes the information still more memorable.
cheers,
Morgan G.
It's about making the material your own.
When you write stuff down, you are creating a new model; though it's meant to mirror the piece of reality you're trying to grasp, it remains an original creation. It's a story written by you, for you. Tell the best story you can, in a language designed for you to understand.
Here's an example of how I take notes for myself. (Click to enlarge.)
I distill major points from the text. I draw lots of diagrams and cartoons. I copy (and often modify) figures from the text. Hand-copying things is a good way to remember them! Adding your own flavor and insight to this fresh copy makes the information still more memorable.
cheers,
Morgan G.
Saturday, October 22, 2011
Slow down and read the textbook!
Welcome. This blog is dedicated to students taking AP/Honors Biology at ICS (LWSD), in the Fall term of 2011. I am a tutor to several students in this class. As I start writing, we are already some ways into the course: just past the second exam. The material is getting more challenging, so I decided to start posting free advice that just might help. The content of these pages is not endorsed by the school or the teacher. Please feel free to post comments.
Dear Students,
Dear Students,
As we begin our intensive study of metabolic pathways, I want to give you some tips on how to approach the material, and how to get into it – or rather how to get it into you, in a useful form.
Once again your teacher has provided an outline of key terms and concepts, each followed by a small space for you to write down what the textbook says about it. The outline for this segment of the course is a formidable document: eight pages long, and consisting of close to one hundred terms. Don’t be scared. The good news is that all of these terms are functionally related to many others, like characters and events in a story. If you are reading a story (say, a serialized saga about dungeons and dragons or something), it’s fairly easy to learn a hundred interrelated terms!
There are two big stories here: Chapter 9 tells the story of how we (all eukaryotes) get energy out of food; Chapter 10 tells about how plants (or more accurately, chloroplasts) get energy out of sunlight, and how plant cells make sugar out of carbon dioxide. Forget about Chapter 10 for now. Focus on the first story: how we get energy from food.
The introduction to Chapter 9 (pages 155 – 159) tells the story in broad outline; explains why energy comes out when oxygen combines with gasoline or glucose; and introduces some key biochemical players in the drama of cellular respiration. Read it like a story; make sure that every part of it makes total sense to you. Don’t take notes, or look at the teacher’s outline, until you are done reading this intro. Enjoy. If you find yourself completely stumped by something, call a classmate to talk about it. If you are both stumped, keep going, and try to make sense of the mystery by analyzing the details.
Having the teacher’s outline in hand, you may be tempted to use it as a study guide: that is, to study by looking at each term in the outline and searching the textbook for the ‘answer.’ Don’t do this! You are not a search engine, and the textbook is not the Internet. Like all books, it is meant to be read and understood as written: each chapter is a narrative made for you to easily travel through, gathering understanding along the way.
My recommendation for taking notes as you read: use blank paper, unlined if possible. Papers should be held together in some kind of notebook. Organize ideas in the paper-space in a way that makes sense to you. Ideas can be circled or colored in for emphasis; can be connected by lines and/or color codes to show relationships; can be arrayed with other ideas, or can sit alone in wide open spaces if you know that there’s much yet unwritten about them.
Afterwards, you can go back to the teacher’s outline to make sure that you have covered everything that’s going to be on the test.
More later, as I get into my study of the metabolic pathways. (I’ve forgotten all the details, so I have to learn it again.)
Cheers,
Morgan G.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)